MASKA
  • Overview
  • Maska Protocol
  • Roadmap
  • ECOSYSTEM
    • Social Media- Maska
      • NFT Profile Integration
      • Masquerade
      • Charism
      • In-platform Q&A/Chats
    • Rewarding Pool
    • DeFi
    • Launchpad
    • NFT
      • NFM (Non-Fungible Mask)
      • Marketplace
      • Mask to DAO
  • THE MSK TOKEN
    • 🪙Utility & Tokenomics
    • ⚖️Distribution
    • 🔥Deflation
  • LINKS
    • Website
    • Twitter
    • Telegram
    • Discord
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Problems with the Current Key-Based Social Model

Maska Protocol

PreviousOverviewNextRoadmap

Last updated 1 year ago

Problems with the Current Key-Based Social Model

The social model nowadays is led by the Key-Based model which has solved the liquidity problem of Web3 Social very well. However, the airdrop strategy based on key holding value is not very friendly to most users. This model amplifies users' profits and losses greatly, and its extremely high speculative nature usually comes at the expense of sustainable product growth.

After analyzing a points airdrop model based on the value of key holdings, Maska proposes an optimization scheme based on the value of key purchases. In this scheme, the cost a user incurs when purchasing a key affects how much ecological benefit he or she receives.

In the others' model, the user purchases the key at point B. When the value of the key decreases, the corresponding expected airdrop received decreases, similar to the B to A trend.

In Maska's model, the user also buys the key at point B. When the value of the key decreases, it is expected to receive more airdrops, similar to the B to C trend. In this model, although the value of the key purchased by the user drops and suffers a loss, the mining gain obtained will be greater.

The data above are all estimates